50th Anniversary of Computer Disk Drive Memory
The first unit was shipped to Crown Zellerbach, which got the RAMAC because the company delivered a lot of computer card stock to IBM. In 2006, about 450 million to 460 million drives will leave factories, according to Disk/Trend. According to the Electrical Engineering Times [1]: The RAMAC marked the birth of an industry with a history as colorful as any in electronics, punctuated by such events as an unprecedented mass exodus from IBM, two major lawsuits that ended in a draw, a fatal strategic misstep stemming from company politics and even a country-club murder. Along the way came sensational boosts in storage capacity and access speeds along with amazing reductions in size. IBM's RAMAC could only be leased, not purchased. The lease price, per year, was about $10,000, or in inflation- adjusted dollars, about $85,000. The RAMAC enclosure cabinet dimensions were 60" × 60" × 29", giving a drive volume of 104,400 in³.
The RAMAC weighed one ton. Based on my estimates from the data available at the links below [6], it consumed about 5 kilowatts. (This required air conditioning, which I have estimated from the available data as itself requiring about the same volume, weight, and power as the RAMAC, so I'm going to score that as an improvement of 2 × 2 × 2.) The folowing table compares the original RAMAC parameters to the currently selling Maxtor DiamondMax II ®.
For the sake of illustration, the improvements noted in bold above can unreasonably be multiplied together to get an overall impression of the total improvement: References:
Following are annotated images of the IBM 305 & the IBM 350 RAMAC. |
The stand-alone IBM 350 RAMAC disk drive.
A RAMAC drive behind the 305 operator's console, for scale.
Full image of IBM 305 with IBM 350 RAMAC drive.
Note the air conditioning unit above the 305.
Perspective view of the 305 at the 61 Broadway Order Center.
CARDS PUNCHED ON RECEIVING PUNCHES ARE FED HERE
A 305 with two RAMACs installed.
Another dual-drive IBM 305.
If I'm not mistaken, this is a 350 on a non-305 machine.
This is, I think, a close-up of the original 350 drive stack.
Detail of the arm positioning mechanism on a later model of the 350.
Some later models of the 350 had two parallel arm sets.
<< Home